xmlns:og='http://ogp.me/ns#' Yeah. Good Times.: If you didn't make it then you don't own it

Friday, July 26, 2013

If you didn't make it then you don't own it

I have a bunch of Facebook friends who make memes about autism awareness and then share them. What happens to them (a lot) is that other pages find them and then, basically, steal them. When my friends complain, most of the time what happens is that the page owner just ignores them, so they're forced to make a complaint to Facebook about theft of intellectual property. Most of the time the picture gets removed by Facebook, but oftentimes what may happen is that the page owner will balk at the idea of being accused of theft. They will then post to their wall about it, and from reading what they write, and from what their commenters write, it's clear to me (and my friends) that most people on Facebook have no idea how copyright laws work, particularly when it comes to digital images and online media. They complain because "it's all about autism awareness," and that "bickering about images" is just petty and wastes our time. Actual quote: "I guess you don't believe in adovcacy if you won't let me use your pictures."

What these folks don't understand, though, in addition to copyright law, is that my friends spend their time and energy making these images and they don't want their work to be stolen!! It's like if you copied a Van Gogh, signed your own name to it, and then when you got sued you said "I'm just trying to spread the word about sunflowers, isn't that our mutual goal?" There's a difference between advocacy and theft, and if your goal is advocacy, you need to understand the law.

Here's the thing: all images that are posted online are subject to the laws of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. This act protect artists and content owners in the same way that standard federal copyright laws do. Facebook, Google, Pinterest, you and me... we're all bound by these laws whether we like it or not.

I'm going to explain the right and wrong way to share images on Facebook, but I'm writing this because there's an important message here, one in which I'm guilty of, as well: if you didn't personally make the image, regardless of where you find it, you're not allowed to use it. That means on Facebook, but in particular, as far as this post is concerned, on your blog. But I'll get to that in a minute. First, a Facebook lesson:

So I'm browsing The Book and I see an image that I like. Cool! Let's share it!!



So, how do I show this to my Facebook friends? It's a simple task to do it legally: you hit that "share" button:



then you'll see this:



hit that "share photo" button and BOOM. You've done it the right way.

Then how do you do it illegally? Well, that will happen when you download the image and then re-upload it to Facebook. Some people will go so far as to alter the image to remove the identifiable information from the author. In that case it's pretty obvious that this person is a thief, but it's possible you could just be doing it wrong and you don't know, which is why I'm writing this tutorial.

Here's what you don't want to do when you see this picture:




and then...



Why? Well, according to Facebook's terms of service, by uploading an image to your profile or page or group, you are giving Facebook "a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license." That means that Facebook has the right to show your image, but only the owner of the intellectual property has the ability to give Facebook these rights. By uploading an image like I've shown in these pictures here, you are making the claim that this image is your intellectual property. This is all part of the really long User Agreement thingy that everybody just scrolls through and never reads.  That's why you can hit the "share" button with no problems, because once the image is uploaded, it belongs to Facebook and they control the share button.

Is that confusing? In a nutshell, "upload" means "I own this." And if you didn't make it, then you don't own it.  And if you do most of your Facebooking from your iPhone, you will already know that the only way to "share" photos is to download and upload; you don't get the option to just share. If this is the case, then just move along, because even on your iPhone upload means "I own this" and you don't own it. Don't be illegal just because it's what's more convenient for you. It's also more convenient to drive too fast if you're late but that doesn't mean you're going to get out of that ticket: you broke the law, and you know it. Wait until you get to a computer or just don't share it at all. If you really care about advocacy then you should respect the rights of the advocates who spend their time and energy making advocacy images.

Okay, so, let's get to the part about the blogging, which is the part that affects ME. And it's all about me, you know; I've got my priorities.

I recently read an article (h/t HH6) about using pictures from Google images, which we all do, and I was very very surprised to read the following:
Current Fair Use image copyright laws say that you’re financially liable for posting copyrighted images, even if:

• You did it by accident
• You immediately take down the picture after receiving a DMCA takedown notice
• The picture is resized
• If the picture is licensed to your Web developer (Getty Images requires that you get your own license, thank you very much)
• You link back to the photo source and cite the photographer’s name
• Your site isn’t commercial and you make no money from your blogs
• You have a disclaimer on the site
• The pic is embedded instead of saved on your server
• You found it on the Internet
HOLY CRAP. So... if I get a cease and desist notice about the kitten I used back in May of 2011, even if I take it down immediately, I have still broken the law and still could get sued. In this case, they were sued for $8,000 !!!!  And they ended up paying, because downloading and uploading from google images is the same as doing it on Facebook. If you upload anything, you are making the claim that the image belong to you. And... like I said... if you didn't make it, it doesn't belong to you. Even if you erased the artist's logo and added in your own. (That actually makes you an asshole, in addition to being a thief).

Well, I sure as hell don't have $8,000 so I'm going through my blog today and taking down all the pictures I've illegally taken from Google images. It will take a while, but... I need my money.



**Note: the images that you see in these screenshot have been used with permission of the awesome hot chick at Four Sea Stars.

**Note2: I'm not a lawyer. Don't take my advice, do your own research or consult an attorney. But more important than that, just don't be an asshole. You don't need to be a lawyer to give that piece of advice.

**Note3: Here's a great royalty-free photo site that I've been using to replace pictures of cats on my blog: http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/



Comments (60)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I probably have a couple of cat pictures on my blog that are not kosher. Nobody reads my bog, though, so who'd notice?
Jeanette Fornier's avatar

Jeanette Fornier · 609 weeks ago

I don't care if people take my images and broadcast them loud and widely - as long as the message of equality for all gets out there! I am a graphic designer... In this instance it is a case of he message being more important than the messenger. If your image is stolen then consider it a compliment, that someone enjoyed and felt a empathy with the message,shared it with possibly millions and your message reached its intended market. It isn't about credit for doing a good job, it is about doing a good job.
9 replies · active 609 weeks ago
I'm an awesome hot chick....AWESOME. In all seriousness, thank you for writing this post. I've been trying to tell people for a long time that it's not OK, and in fact quiet illegal, to upload my work and share it around the interwebs as their own. Some people have been very kind and understanding and others have not. And lets be clear here---there is a difference between Autism Advocacy and stealing. Just because I don't like you stealing my work doesn't mean I'm against advocacy. It only means I'm against theft.

Well said Jill and thank you.
6 replies · active 609 weeks ago
FYI, you can share legally with a share button from the iPhone app. Now there really is no excuse.

And most artists I know are pretty protective of their work. Just because there is a positive message doesn't exempt it from the law. I wonder, however, if there is a way to attach a Creative Commons license to Facebook images if you do want them To be shared and want to set parameters as to how (i.e. with or without attribution).
1 reply · active 609 weeks ago
You can share from Android too, so no excuse. Just laziness. Or asshishness to blame.
1 reply · active 609 weeks ago
I do monitor for people reposting my photos and memes without permission - but once found, I take their intent & delivery into consideration. Did they leave my watermark or did they try to hide it? Did they reference my website in their comment or did they say 'hey look what I made'? etc. I don't base it just on "You didn't use the share button so here's your C&D". Some people are trying to take credit, and some just don't know. People who don't deal in photography, blogging etc really don't know about copyright law beyond basic facts like you can't repaint a Picasso and call it yours. That doesn't make them bad people, just uninformed. (unless they give you attitude when you ask them to remove it.... then you can call them poop heads)
When I share from Google, I am not claiming it as my own. Everyone knows I didn't do it...so how does this work where it's suddenly mine now? Believe the laws need to be changed NOW to reflect some COMMON SENSE.
2 replies · active 609 weeks ago
Heather Cooper's avatar

Heather Cooper · 609 weeks ago

Idea....Do not post anything you don't want to be 'shared' or 'stolen' this is the age of technology and everything is out there, people find away so stop putting things out there that you don't want out there and that stops a lot of it, so if you can't 'share' than do not put it on there for others to get to. I have two boys on the spectrum and two not, I put what want on my timeline for people to get, what I do not is blog because I am not a writer and have no time to do so raising four kids, two on the spectrum and two not one who is not has celiac disease, so I am busy just like all the moms here.......Simple do not put anything out there you do not want out there.
1 reply · active 609 weeks ago
I only steal photos from my children's FB pages. I use Flickr's Creative Commons pages to find other pictures, and put the attribution on my blog...but before I knew about the legal stuff, I know I have some highly illegal (and unaltered) content hanging around.

I guess I should do some blog housecleaning too - maybe I could create a graphic to replace all the illegal ones - something like "I used to filch copyrighted content, but now I know better".
I really, really try to be careful about this, but I'm sure I've made some mistakes. It's a hard area to navigate unless you take all your own photos. Sometimes I've needed something, found it, and then gone on some never ending treasure hunt to find the owner, and it doesn't get me anywhere. I wish there were better ways to, I guess, tag media. Or maybe it is tagged and I just don't understand how to find it. I'm not exactly the most tech savvy person on the planet...
Eric Bryden 's avatar

Eric Bryden · 609 weeks ago

Have familiarized myself with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act/Law more then you would know! Like I said, Have a Masters Degree in Media Design! Jillsmo I know you want the credit by them hitting the share button, and I understand that very much...we all do! But by not hitting the share button is not against the law less they did not give you credit.....taking images from programs that you have purchased or from someone that took a photo and then you edit it to make something of yours...u still have to give credit to the program or others who created the font, image or piece of creative art....I will later post links and other books that you can get more informed on...if you really want to debate you really have to take your piece of art and write up a copyright form to have it officaly copyrighted by law...u can get the forms on line or from the book i mentioned above.....i understand you want them to hit the share button....very understandable! but as long as they give you the credit and all who had some way in creating it like the programs you used or the person who took the image or created the font and est then its legal....and unless you had it officaly copyrighted then it will be hard in the long run to do anything about it...if you are going to complain, then learn how to copyright you art and really learn the laws...but you are right jill they should hit the share button....not disagreeing with you there,.....just disagreeing that its not against the law to not hit the share button as long as they give you credit....its like when you write a paper you have to give credit like......(Bryden, pg2) and at the end have a reference page! will post some links for you all....maybe someone needs to write facebook and see what they can do about the share link button....but not all cells let you do that......
1 reply · active 609 weeks ago
Eric clearly did not read the entire post. Our images and words are under copyright protection as soon as we publish them. You don't have to file a form for every single item you publish. That is just incorrect, and also, silly.

Plus, you are annoying. Just look at you up there, pontificating all over the place. What a bloody mess you've made, with all those words and ellipses. You're drunk, go home now.
4 replies · active 609 weeks ago
Not hitting the share button isn't against the law, that is correct, but by that same standing I should be able to lift all of your work and upload it to my page and get cracking on some new stuff. I'm sure the facebook poilce have better things to do. Last I checked, as soon as you created something you had copyright on it, you don't necessarily have to walk down to the ol copyright office and file. I have discussed this with Facebook and they very actively remove pictures, images, memes that are in photo albums, where they don't belong. From what I can gather, there are apps now on your phone so you can share in that manner, via your phone.
Whose the douchebag just commenting links? If you're gonna try to be an ass and leave links at least man/woman up with ur name!!! Prob some chicken shit using a fake account or something.
ok. so since I read this there is a bit of 'commentering' going on, but I had these thoughts :
It's a good reminder and I think newer bloggers and those who are passionate more about a cause and their own context but less knowledgeable of the medium blog and, related, the ethics plus the law that should (but doesn't ) reign on facebook... well, I think they should at least give this a good thought before they use the next photo. Many bloggers know this for a longtime, but I am also now thinking, might have to go through my posts..
More importantly though, I think people should be aware that there are alternative sources to use other people's pictures. Deviant art has stockphotos that can be modified and used, Flickr is easily searchable for content under creative commons licences, and there are others.
Although I understand why people do it, I often find it a shame when photos are basically rendered ugly with big watermarks on them, but on the other hand, some bloggers use watermarked stockphotos like they really don't care (when coming from a commercial website.. i would be careful with that..)
as for the memes.. yeah, I don't know.. I am really surprised to see that in a special needs (parenting) community people are stealing & modifying other's content. but I have seen people complain about it before.. if it's a good meme, just share it. if the person has their name or their blog on it, why not leave them the credit..? share it and get inspired to make your own, it's really not that hard..
oh, one more thing. this maybe different on iphone and others, but i am beta tester for the next android facebook version. my phone always alowed me to save photos, but not via a menu button of facebook itself..
but in the new update, 'saving photos others share directly to your phone will be easier' . looks like facebook doesn't really do much to help users protect their content either..
1 reply · active 608 weeks ago
I'm not intending increase the flame on this topic, but please share with me the sites of the douchebags who do this kind of crap. The least I can do is to help bringing their FB page (and website) down.

With the photography business changing in the last couple of years, you would be surprised how many ppl steal other photog's pics, remove watermark, and claim them as their portfolio. Yeah. Douchebags, not only for the photographer, but for the innocent future customer.
And I thought all this time by putting a link and where I got the pic from I was doing stuff above board. Wow, thanks for letting us know about this
Wow! Now I need to go through my blog and check the pics I used out - I thought as long as we cited the source that we used that it was okay just like when you were writing a research paper in highschool and college - I have a long night ahead of me!! Thanks for the link to the site for the free pics..I'm going to use that from now on.
Brilliant as usual! I almost wrote "brillinat ass usual" and I would have been fine with that typo.
I probably have a number of cat images on my weblog that are not kosher. Nobody flows my bog, though, so who'd notice?

Post a new comment

Comments by