xmlns:og='http://ogp.me/ns#' Yeah. Good Times.: If it's the beaches

Friday, December 2, 2011

If it's the beaches

When I first started this blog I would pose some philosophical questions that I had been pondering, and then I would have a discussion about it with the two people who were reading me, except those two people were people I was talking to all the time, anyway, so posing the question here and then discussing it with my friends was kind of a useless endeavor.

NOW, however, there are at LEAST two more of you who will read this, so maybe I can have a longer and more in depth discussion about it. So let's try it again!! YAY!!!

Okay. Below is a video and lyrics to an Avett Brothers song called If It's the Beaches, and here is my question: A big theme in Avett Brothers' lyrics seems to be the concept of "rearrange my plans and change for you," which is a line in this song, and it got me thinking: is that the ultimate love song a man can sing for a woman, that they will change who they are to stay together? Is that what women want men to tell them? Is that what men think they have to do to keep a relationship together?

Thoughts? I went with the studio version of the song because it was the one that was easiest to hear. Don't actually look at the video, just listen to the song and read the lyrics that are below....





If It's the Beaches

Don't say it's over
Cause that's the worst news I could hear I swear that I will
Do my best to be here just the way you like it
Even though its hard to hide
Push my feelings all aside
I will rearrange my plans and change for you

If I could go back
That's the first thing I would do I swear that I would
Do my best to follow through
Come up with a master plan
A homerun hit, a winning stand
A guarantee and not a promise
That I'll never let your love slip from my hands

If it's the beaches
If it's the beaches' sands you want
Then you will have them
If it's the mountains' bending rivers
Then you will have them
If it's the wish to run away
Then I will grant it
Take whatever what you think of
While I go gas up the truck
Pack the old love letters up
We will read them when we forget why we left here

Edit: I changed the wording of this post a little because I didn't think I said it right the first time.



Comments (37)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Because girls are always right? Just a guess... but on a less jackassery note: yes maam. We should all be willing to change for eachother. Ying and yang..what makes the world go round. It's only when we have too much ying and not enough yang (or vice versa) we get into trouble. Kinda like me when I don't have enough splenda for my coffee...not so splendid.
My recent post Cutting SSI is NOT the answer dummy!
wasnt_serious's avatar

wasnt_serious · 695 weeks ago

Agreed...if you are in a relationship you both change. I think they call it 'growing' You make compromises, not sacrifices/changes. Although there are exceptions i.e alcoholics, workaholics, etc. to the whole 'You need to change.'
Although I think the song is more about the panic that starts when the relationship really begins to end. You think that 'If I only did that they then will love me again' I am not sure how you feel about country music, but Blake Shelton's She wouldn't be gone is another example of the 'change' I think a lot of songs sing about...hindsight and all that jazz
Here's what pisses me off. . . I promise I'll tie it into your question.

I worked at a job for three and a half years. At the end of the 2nd year they promised that at the end of the third year, they would give me a salary bump to bring me up to local standards. . . cost of living. . . my position in the company, etc, as indicated by some multimillion dollar industry survey they conducted. Not THAT year, because times were tight and they could bump me, but not the bump they knew was fair. It was my first job.

As a young engineer in my first job, i worked my tail off attempting to earn that coming bump. 40 hours weeks were the "minimum" expected of someone in the consulting engineering field, so I worked 50 or 60. . . one week I remember 80; leaving the office at 2:00 a.m. to get a little sleep and shower and change clothes before going back.

At the end of the third year the economy took a bit of downturn and the company summoned me for my goals review and salary bump. We know we owe you, they said, and you met all your goals and have great reviews. . . but we can't do it. The company has dictated a maximum bump of 3% per department.

"Not my problem," I said. "Bump me 12% and bump someone else 1%. How you end up at your 3% roof doesn't concern me. What concerns ME is the promise you made me last year to bump me 12%." They went back to the drawing board. I checked back a week later. Nothing. Two weeks. Nothing. After the third week my boss came to me and said, "We looked into it. Our hands are tied."

I was unhappy. I looked for a new job. I interviewed. I got second interviews. I got a job offer. I know how the industry works. Companies will pay you to stay. There is no "loyalty". They try to minimize their costs. . . you as an employee try to maximize your salary. The conventional wisdom is, you go to your boss with your new job offer clenched in your fist and say. . . "match it or I'm out of here". But I was pissed. I felt like I'd been "betrayed" (it sounds dramatic, but I was 26).

Instead I offered my two week notice. My boss said, "is there anything we can do to convince you to stay?" I said. . .

"No. And if you make me a counteroffer, I'll be pissed off. I tried for a year and a half to get salary increase that you told me the company owed me. If you somehow find the money NOW, as I give my two week notice, I won't ever spend an day in this office where I'm not angry at the company."

A day later the HR director arrived. Same offer. Same answer.

A day after that the company president arrived. Same offer. I repeated my answer more tactfully to him.

And now, at long last, my point. You never want to be in a relationship where the threat of leaving is the only thing that prompts change. In a loving relationship change is organic. Change, if not expected, is definitely natural.

A priest once told my then fiance and I, that you fall in love (real love, not that stupid Kardashian married-today-divorced-tomorrow lust/money arrangment) because you see strengths in your mate that you want for yourself. Things that your mate has that you wish you had. My wife's organization, her compassion for others, her loving nature. . . these were weaknesses in me that marrying her helped me strengthen. . . and change.

That change was NOT done at the end of a shotgun barrel of threatened departure. It wasn't change "or else". If you love someone. Really love someone, then the change happens without the threat. And it happens to both of you.

Sorry for the schpiel.
My recent post Blinded by Science - Part 1
4 replies · active 695 weeks ago
Good answer. But then I changed my post a little because I didn't ask it right the first time. Of course we all know that relationships are two way streets and it isn't fair to expect one person to change while the other one stays the same, but that wasn't what I was getting at. Sorry.

DO women want men to change for them? IS the ultimate love song a man can sing to a woman the promise that he will change?
Well I can't even begin to answer that. I'm emotionally drained after pouring out my heart into a response that your subsequent edit of the question invalidated. hmph.
My recent post Blinded by Science - Part 1
Well... rest up and get back to me!
pfft, you'll have another blog for me to comment on by then. . .
My recent post Blinded by Science - Part 1
HO-LY SHIT! I didn't realize how long that comment was until I hit "submit". You can delete it if you want. Maybe I'll post a blog in response to your blog. And we can all hop from blog to blog like it's a gigantic snail-paced coffee conversation.
My recent post Blinded by Science - Part 1
4 replies · active 695 weeks ago
I just woke up from a dream about going to a coffee shop. Weird.
Dude, I TOLD you, right before the cafe turned into a McDonalds/bouncy castle... that was my caramel macchiato, NOT your soy latte!!
It's not you, it's me. If someone is already packed and out the door, they are definately not into you. Period. Chewing with your mouth closed isn't going to change anything.
I love love love that song. Sometimes I close my eyes and imagine Tim Riggins is singing it to me.

No, I don't. Not really........
My recent post the snow angel
1 reply · active 695 weeks ago
I don't know who that is but that's hot
I've been trying to figure out how i want to say this...

I want my husband to grow and change, because hopefully it will make him a better man. But i don't want him to change because i WANT him to. Does that make sense? because that kind of change seems selfish to me. I want him to change because HE wants to--because he wants to make our relationship better, because he wants to grow.

I don't change because he wants something specific from me (well, not ALL the time) but i do try to listen to him and grow based on what he and i both think.

I read the lyrics as if sung by an ex boyfriend of mine, and realized i would NOT want him to sing that to me. You either grow in the relationship you are in or you don't. and if you are not inspired to change by being with the person you are with, then you aren't going to, no matter how much they want you to.

did that make ANY fucking sense? I need to go lay down.
My recent post Turns Out I Was A Hipster And Didn’t Even Know It.
1 reply · active 695 weeks ago
That totally made sense. I'll lie down with you.
That sounds like something I'm doing for my son. I'm the one changing to meet his needs and help him. And I wouldn't change that for anything in the world. Well, except for a cup of coffee right when I get out of bed. Maybe hubs can bend a little and make that happen.
My recent post I may be exhausted but damn-it, I'm a Queen.
2 replies · active 695 weeks ago
It's totally different when it's your kid. TOTALLY different. When you become a parent, I think you are morally obligated to at least make an attempt to change yourself for your child. You can be the product of a shitty upbringing but once you duplicate yourself you have no choice but to look at yourself and figure out ways to make things better for your kid. Ad autism into the mix and you'll quickly realize that you don't even have a choice. I've always said that autism is in charge, no matter how much I disagree, and it's my job to adapt to it, and not expect that it will adapt to me. Because it won't. Stupid autism.
But see Jill, that's EXACTLY why you are such a good mom to Child 1 and Child 2. And all those damn furry cats, can't forget about the cats.
My recent post I may be exhausted but damn-it, I'm a Queen.
I think that if you change TOGETHER it's good. I'm not sure about changing just FOR someone (I mean, yes, if my husband is being a jerk and I tell him to stop being a jerk, I expect him to change for me, but if he, say, wanted to be an artist and I told him to be an accountant, I'm not sure that's a good change for the relationship). So: yes, but also no.
I think it's unrealistic to hang that "I'll love you if you change" carrot, as well as the "I'll change for you baby, I promise" carrot in a relationship. Change is hard work.

At the beginning, both people are on their best behavior - so if you can't tolerate them when they're trying their best, don't up and marry them and expect them to change later, because you're looking for disappointment. Women seem to want to change a guy to suit them - instead, they should look for a guy who satisfies their list of traits (or comes closest to do doing so) right from the beginning.

You DID have a list of traits you were looking for, didn't you? Took me a long time to figure that one out.
My recent post Book Blurb Friday - 12/02/11
Handflapper's avatar

Handflapper · 695 weeks ago

I always tell my young friends, "If you find yourself saying, 'Things would be so perfect with him/her if only. . . ' then you need to bail." Those if only's only get bigger and more promlematic as a relationship goes on. But yeah, people should change together as love grows, because they want to be all that they can be for their partner.

Jim's answer was excellent, and mirrors what happened in my first marriage. When I was finally out the door, my ex said, "But I'll change! NOW I see what you meant!" after my saying it for three damn years. By then it was too, too late. I just didn't care any more.

Wait, did I answer your question? Is this what women want? Oh, yes. My current husband definitely changed when we started dating, but it was nothing I ever asked him to do or expected of him. What he wanted in life changed because of what he wanted with me and my children, and that changed him.
My recent post The much-anticipated post-Thanksgiving post is finally here.
hmmm... change is tricky business because i think it depends on the motivation behind the change. if it's out of fear or compulsion by another person, it's not likely to last. if it's because you've seen the error of your former ways or because making a change provides something good to someone you love without hurting yourself, then it can only be a good thing. is it creating growth in the changer or just resentment and frustration?
My recent post what it's NOT about
Great song! thanks for sharing. I don't think I have seen this serious side of you (I'm new).

I have to go with both as well. Obviously, we, as women, are perfect and should not have to change. However, once you make that commitment, I think you have cave and realize that you might have to change to stay true to your word.

Finally, I do think that the change occurs in unison rather than in isolation. Thus, you change together as a couple.

My recent post Cartoons and Behavior Analysis
I would be more pissed if someone TOLD me they would change and then didn't. Heck I am annoyed whenever someone doesn't do what they say they will. I don't want to be told what people think I want to hear (really).
My recent post December!
My belief is that when women are young, they want a man to change for them, thinking that it's romantic. When they are older, they learn that a man has to want to change for himself and his own reasons, or it has no meaning for her. And when they are older still, they hope that there is no need for change, only compromise.
We tend to forget that when we love someone, we should love all of them, not just parts. Otherwise, is it really love? Or just tolerance?
My recent post I Was Hoping for Better News
Well, I have had to change for my wife. She insisted on many of the changes, sometimes they were hard and really stressed our relationship. We hashed out more shit in our first 3 years than many couples tackle in 10. We are best friends who fight like friends, we change for each other, and it makes us better people. Women do want men to change, wether they want to admit it or not. But to promise to change or to plead with a woman not to leave you and offer to change is not a love song, it's a wimpy, submissive lement, that should turn most women off. A man stands his tallest when he stoops to help a child, and a man is at his strongest when he bends to make his wife wife happy. I choose to change so I can keep the love of my life at my side. If all she asks is change, I am getting off easy, since I would do anything to keep her as my wife. I love her.
5 replies · active 694 weeks ago
Yeah, you were one of the two people I talked to about this the first time. And agree with you right up until the part where you say "if all she asks is change I am getting off easy."

What would she do if you asked her to change for you?
Ok, so I ws just talking out of my ass with the getting off easy thing, you always call me out on shit like that, I forgot who's blog I was on I guess...LOL.... She would probably not take kindly to me asking her to change. But I don't see us as the same people. You can ask me to change and I will consider it, I'm not perfect. But people like her, have to change gradually through experiences and learning. I give her the experiences and convince her of certain things that direct her into the change that I want. This way she feels like she has "grown" . To me it's the same thing.
You know what's funny? The first time I posted about this song, I ALSO said you were full of shit! :)

It's okay. She'll never see this
re-do-over
I will admit that I was just talking out of my ass with that "easy" comment, sometimes I get overly bogus.
I do not think she would appreciate me asking her to change at all. But we are different people. She can ask me to change, and I will consider it, I'm not perfect, and frankly I could use some tweaking. But her, on the other hand, has to change gradually over time, with experience and gaining knowledge. So, I just make sure that she has the experience and gains the knowledge I want her to that will move her in the direction I want thus changing her to what I prefer. This way she can feel like she has "grown". To me it's the same thing, since she could just resist my pushing her in the direction I want. But she doesn't. SHe changes for me on her terms. And that's fine with me.
I replied to this 3 times now and none of them took. So this one probably will.
I don't think that it's a question of gender. I think the message of the song, and that particular lyric, is meant to convey that the person is willing to make the changes they feel would change the situation. I think it speaks of sacrifice at the heart of the matter because a person shouldn't have to change/be expected to change by the person they are in a relationship with.

I guess I don't really understand how someone could say that they love a person when they want their partner to be someone other than who they are at that moment.

Someone wanted me to be someone other than myself and it hurt. It was like I wasn't good enough for them and it felt like a sort of ultimatum, like if I didn't change, then the relationship would eventually fail because of my failure to change for the other person.

Getting back to the song, it speaks of the desperation of someone to keep the love of another when faced with the moment of losing them.

Post a new comment

Comments by